← Portfolio
MSPYTHON & AI ANALYTICS LAB
GitHub ↗

VERIFIED PROJECT RESULTS · AUGUST 2026

From raw datasets to explainable model results.

Four end-to-end Python projects covering exploratory data analysis, classification, regression, clustering, ensembles and recurrent neural-network forecasting.

NumPy • Pandas • scikit-learn • TensorFlow/Keras • Matplotlib • Seaborn
4Completed projects14+Models evaluated100%Reproducible outputs

CLASSIFICATION · REGRESSION · CLUSTERING

Heart Disease Machine-Learning Analysis

Patient records were cleaned, explored, transformed and evaluated through multiple supervised and unsupervised models.

Download Python source ↓
BEST ROC-AUC0.929Soft Voting Ensemble
RF ACCURACY85.9%Classification
REGRESSION RMSE22.06Maximum heart rate
CLUSTERS5Highest silhouette
Verified classification ROC-AUC comparison
K-Means silhouette score by cluster count

Workflow

Missing-value treatment, descriptive statistics, scaling, train/test split, five classifiers, soft-voting ensemble, two regressors and K-Means cluster selection.

Decision insight

The ensemble produced the strongest discrimination, while the cluster analysis revealed five data-driven patient profiles for exploratory segmentation.

Responsible interpretation

This is an educational data-science demonstration—not a clinical diagnostic system. Medical decisions require validated clinical models and professional review.

HEALTHCARE INFRASTRUCTURE ANALYTICS

USA Hospital Capacity & Helipad Intelligence

National hospital records were used for bed-capacity regression, helipad classification and facility clustering.

Download Python source ↓
HELIPAD ROC-AUC0.976Soft voting classifier
HELIPAD F10.970Classification
BED RMSE115.03Voting regressor
FACILITY CLUSTERS5Hospital profiles
Verified helipad model comparison
Bed-regression error comparison

Workflow

Data cleaning, hospital-type profiling, capacity modelling, ensemble classification, regression evaluation and K-Means segmentation.

Decision insight

Helipad availability was highly classifiable in the prepared feature space; bed prediction was useful but retained substantial uncertainty.

Responsible interpretation

Facility locations and attributes require current authoritative validation before planning emergency access or healthcare investments.

TIME SERIES · RNN · LSTM · GRU

Healthcare Stock Price Forecasting

Historical daily prices were transformed into sequences and evaluated with recurrent neural networks and an honest baseline comparison.

Download Python source ↓
BEST MODEL MAE$4.43LSTM
DIRECTIONAL ACCURACY52.5%LSTM
TEST R²0.996Price-level fit
NEXT-CLOSE ENSEMBLE$478.16After supplied history
Test MAE across baseline and recurrent models
Directional accuracy of recurrent models

Workflow

Time-series feature creation, chronological split, scaling, sequence generation, SimpleRNN/LSTM/GRU training, back-testing and ensemble forecasting.

Decision insight

Neural models closely tracked price levels, but directional accuracy remained near 50–52% and the previous-close baseline was highly competitive.

Responsible interpretation

This is a learning demonstration, not financial advice. High price-level R² does not guarantee profitable or reliable directional forecasts.

REGULATORY TIME SERIES · DEEP LEARNING

FDA AI Medical-Device Authorization Forecast

Monthly authorization counts were modelled with seasonal features and three recurrent neural-network architectures.

Download Python source ↓
BEST MAE4.96LSTM
BEST TEST R²0.243LSTM
BASELINE MAE7.70Previous-year seasonal
3-MONTH OUTLOOK28 · 28 · 27Ensemble counts
Model MAE versus seasonal baseline
Verified three-month ensemble outlook

Workflow

Monthly aggregation, seasonal encoding, rolling features, chronological split, SimpleRNN/LSTM/GRU training and three-month ensemble projection.

Decision insight

The LSTM outperformed the seasonal baseline in this run; the ensemble projected 28, 28 and 27 monthly authorizations after the supplied period.

Responsible interpretation

These are model outputs from a supplied dataset—not official FDA forecasts. Neural-network results can vary slightly between training runs.

COMMON MODEL PIPELINE

Inspect → clean → explore → model → evaluate → explain

  1. 01 Load and inspect
  2. 02 Clean and prepare
  3. 03 Explore patterns
  4. 04 Train models
  5. 05 Compare metrics
  6. 06 Communicate limits